What does a camera has to do with this? And who is the author of this blog post? Well, just keep reading and you’ll understand.
If you have developed an academic career, you have probably heard that signing of research papers is usually a controversial issue. There is a kind of hierarchy that allows distinguishing the different types of researchers that participate in a scientific team: graduate or undergraduate students, research engineers and hired people in general, team leaders… However, there is no rule governing whose job is to publish the results gathered by the team. And who should appear as their author? The one who found the problem? Or the one who posed a solution? Or even the one who implemented it?
On the other hand, whenever you watch a movie, either at the beginning or at the end of the film you are precisely informed of who was the author of the story, the supporting actors, the producer, etc. The same happens with novels and many other kinds of art in general.
So, why not benefit from the above described technique to bring light to research papers signing? This is the idea we have introduced in the article “What Science can Learn from the Arts: Some Thoughts about Author Order in Research Papers” that has been just published in CACM Viewpoints (Vol. 55 (9), September 2012, pp. 39-41).
What is your view? Is this just a too provoking idea? We invite you to have a look and let us know your opinion …
And finally, the credits for this post 🙂 :
Original Idea: Esperanza Marcos
Writing up: Juan Manuel Vara, Valeria de Castro
Publisher: Jordi Cabot
If you liked this post, you should also follow my thoughts on twitter about software development or web design, wordpress and social media .
Just whose research rants are these?
I´ll be happy to publish research rants from any “desperate” researcher out there!
I can only say that it’s a great idea… Where could I sign to move this forward ? 😉